Accountability as personal commitment

As if!
Paul

I think you are a powerful example of someone who focusses upon "what we can achieve" as opposed to what "we must achieve". I hope I'm not one of these people hiding round the corner?

An interesting debate. I have no doubt that the kind of accountability which guides me is where I choose to do the best possible job I can. On taking on the position of HT I was well aware of the responsibilities I was taking on though it is interesting to note that I felt different after being appointed than I did when I was acting for the year. I took this to mean that in being appointed by the committee that they were willing to trust in me as a future leader and manager of DGS. In applying for the post ( especially having acted for a year) was a clear marker from me that I can do the job. This coupled with the year's experience that others had had of me as an HT resulted in my appointment. I, therefore, see this as a recognition of my ability and as such take accountability as read. I choose to see accountability as a position aspect of my job. Then the external agencies come along to question this-call it validation, quality assurance/insurance - anything you like - it still raises questions on the basic principles surrounding the inititial application for the job. It is at this point that the negativity, brought about by fear, enters. If we could somehow let all prospective HT's act up before appointment then I would argue that the need for quality assurance etc. would be reduced. How this would be accomplished I'm not sure! Anyway, I still remain positive and confident as regards accountability, whilst keeping an eye on the strangers round the corner whose existance is to raise doubts and in some cases fear!! You know who you are!